
A/B Test Raw Storage vs Provisioned Storage
Compare raw A/B test data storage with provisioned storage after database overhead and replication.
Raw record data is useful for understanding payload volume, while provisioned storage is more useful for infrastructure planning. The difference comes from database overhead and the number of complete copies retained.
- 100% Free
- No Sign-Up Required
- Private & Secure
- Mobile Friendly
About A/B Test Raw Storage vs Provisioned Storage
Raw record data is useful for understanding payload volume, while provisioned storage is more useful for infrastructure planning. The difference comes from database overhead and the number of complete copies retained.
2
Comparisons
5
Key Factors
Instant
Results
100%
Free to Use
Raw data estimate vs provisioned capacity
Compare the two storage views used when planning an experiment database.
| Factor | Option A: Raw Storage | Option B: Provisioned Storage | What It Means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Includes event and assignment payloads | Yes | Yes | Both begin with the same estimated event and assignment records. |
| Includes indexes and metadata | No | Yes, through overhead allowance | Raw storage omits database structures outside record payloads. |
| Includes operational headroom | No | Yes, if included in overhead | Capacity planning generally needs an allowance beyond measured payloads. |
| Includes replica copies | No | Yes | Provisioned storage multiplies the requirement by the replication factor. |
| Best use | Estimating data volume and payload efficiency | Planning total database capacity | The useful view depends on the planning question. |
Raw storage shows the underlying experiment data volume; provisioned storage estimates the space required after practical database allowances.
Lower event detail vs richer event detail
Compare compact event records with detailed records for the same experiment traffic.
| Factor | Option A: Compact Event Tracking | Option B: Detailed Event Tracking | What It Means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average record size | Smaller | Larger | Fewer retained properties generally reduce stored bytes per event. |
| Storage growth | Lower per event | Higher per event | Event record size is multiplied by every tracked event. |
| Analysis context | Limited to essential fields | May support deeper segmentation | The appropriate level of detail depends on the questions the experiment must answer. |
| Schema and governance effort | Usually simpler | Often more complex | More properties may require more validation, documentation, and retention management. |
| Best use | Focused experiments with defined metrics | Exploratory analysis with justified fields | Avoid collecting fields that are not needed for measurement or analysis. |
Detailed event tracking can improve analytical flexibility, but it increases the stored volume of every event and may add operational complexity.
Key Differences at a Glance
Raw storage excludes database overhead and replica copies; provisioned storage includes both.
Event data commonly grows faster than assignment data because multiple events can be stored per visitor.
Replication increases total stored capacity in direct proportion to the number of complete copies.
Larger event payloads affect every event record, so small per-event changes can have a large total effect.
The number of variants does not normally multiply visitor assignments within one experiment.
How to Decide
Assumptions
- Each visitor has one assignment record for the experiment.
- The selected overhead reasonably represents the database environment being considered.
- Replica copies contain complete copies of the experiment data.
- Comparisons focus on storage volume rather than cost, reliability, or query performance.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which result should I use for database capacity planning?
Use provisioned storage because it includes the chosen overhead allowance and replication factor.
Can reducing event size have a meaningful impact?
Yes. The average event size is applied to every stored event, so even a small reduction can affect total volume at scale.
Is a higher replication factor always better?
It increases the number of stored copies and capacity required. The appropriate configuration depends on system requirements outside this estimate.
Should I remove all event properties to save storage?
Not necessarily. Retain fields needed for valid measurement and analysis, while avoiding unnecessary or rarely used properties.
Ready to calculate your result?
Try the calculator and compare options with your own inputs.